{"id":290,"date":"2018-04-11T07:45:14","date_gmt":"2018-04-11T07:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/securitybydesign.de\/?p=290"},"modified":"2018-04-11T07:45:14","modified_gmt":"2018-04-11T07:45:14","slug":"facebooks-hindsight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/securitybydesign.de\/?p=290","title":{"rendered":"Facebook’s hindsight?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dear Mark Zuckerberg,<\/p>\n

apparently now you also consider<\/a> what I tried to convince your Head of Brussels Office at a panel discussion at the IAPP Data Protection Congress in Brussels already in 2013: A paid version of Facebook without ads and analysis of user behavior as an alternative to protect privacy. But my suggestion was denied and my concerns regarding loss of trust not taken seriously.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Also we recommended to assess and whitelist third parties and only hand over personal data to those who are trustworthy to reduce the OWASP Top 10 Privacy Risk<\/a> #7 some years ago. There are further serious privacy issues in Facebook that I will report to your data abuse bug bounty program<\/a>. Facebook should start to listen to privacy experts before your business gets damaged even more. I would be happy to discuss.<\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dear Mark Zuckerberg, apparently now you also consider what I tried to convince your Head of Brussels Office at a panel discussion at the IAPP Data Protection Congress in Brussels already in 2013: A paid version of Facebook without ads … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-privacy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t